Revocation proceeding procedures

The Assistant Secretary must follow the procedures set out in the remaining sections of the subpart. See the text of 1902.48 which directs that when reconsideration leads the Assistant Secretary to propose revocation of an affirmative 18(e) determination, he shall follow the procedures in the remaining sections of Subpart D of Part 1902. (See also Part 1902 overview for Subpart D context.)

This requirement applies when, as a result of the Assistant Secretary's reconsideration, he proposes to revoke an affirmative 18(e) determination. The provision states that "Whenever, as a result of his reconsideration, the Assistant Secretary proposes to revoke his affirmative 18(e) determination, he shall follow the procedures in the remaining sections of this subpart" (1902.48).

No — 1902.48 does not list the specific steps or timelines; it directs that the Assistant Secretary must follow the procedures found in the remaining sections of the subpart. The section is a directive to use the subsequent Subpart D provisions rather than detailing the procedures itself (1902.48).

You can find the detailed procedures in the remaining sections of Subpart D of Part 1902. Section 1902.48 explicitly directs the Assistant Secretary to follow those subsequent sections when a revocation is proposed; refer to 1902.48 and the broader Part 1902 for the rest of Subpart D's procedures.

No — 1902.48 specifically applies when the Assistant Secretary proposes to revoke his affirmative 18(e) determination after reconsideration. The section's scope is limited to that circumstance and directs following the remaining subpart procedures when that precise situation occurs (1902.48).

Yes — 1902.48 is triggered when the Assistant Secretary, as a result of his reconsideration, proposes to revoke an affirmative 18(e) determination. The provision expressly links the proposal to revoke to the outcome of reconsideration (1902.48).

1902.48 does not itself state whether public notice or comment is required; it requires that the Assistant Secretary follow the procedures in the remaining sections of the subpart, where such procedural details (including any notice or comment requirements) would be specified. See 1902.48 and the subsequent sections of Subpart D for those specifics.

No — 1902.48 applies only when reconsideration leads the Assistant Secretary to propose revocation of an affirmative 18(e) determination. If no such proposal is made, the directive in 1902.48 to follow the remaining subpart procedures is not triggered (1902.48).

The procedures are contained in Subpart D of Part 1902, titled "Procedures for Determinations Under section 18(e) of the Act." Section 1902.48 itself is within that subpart and directs use of the remaining Subpart D procedures when a revocation is proposed (1902.48; see Part 1902 for subpart context).

Yes — 1902.48 mandates following the procedures in the remaining sections of the subpart whenever the Assistant Secretary, after reconsideration, proposes to revoke his affirmative 18(e) determination. The section does not carve out exceptions based on scope; it requires use of the subpart procedures for such proposed revocations (1902.48).

1902.48 specifically refers to the Assistant Secretary proposing revocation after reconsideration and directs that the Assistant Secretary follow the remaining subpart procedures; it does not authorize substitution by a different official. The provision identifies the Assistant Secretary as the actor in this context (1902.48).

The exact trigger language is in the text of 1902.48: "Whenever, as a result of his reconsideration, the Assistant Secretary proposes to revoke his affirmative 18(e) determination, he shall follow the procedures in the remaining sections of this subpart." For broader context, see Part 1902.