OSHA AI Agent
Get instant answers to any safety question.
Request Demo
OSHA 1915.53

Welding near preservative coatings

Subpart D

22 Questions & Answers
10 Interpretations

Questions & Answers

Under 1915.53(b) who must test a preservative coating for flammability before welding, cutting, or heating?

A competent person must test the coating to determine its flammability before starting any hot work. See 1915.53(b).

  • The shipyard rules use the term “competent person”; OSHA explains that for Subpart D the competent person must be able to recognize and evaluate hazards and specify protections (Competent person requirements in shipyards).
  • A practical test is to scrape a small sample: coatings that "burn with extreme rapidity" are considered highly flammable per 1915.53(b).

Under 1915.53(b) how is a preservative coating defined as "highly flammable"?

A preservative coating is considered highly flammable when scrapings of the coating "burn with extreme rapidity." See 1915.53(b).

  • If scrapings ignite and burn very quickly in a small test, the coating meets the standard's definition of highly flammable.
  • When coatings are judged highly flammable, follow the precautions in 1915.53(c).

Under 1915.53(c) what must be done when a preservative coating is determined to be highly flammable?

You must prevent ignition by stripping the highly flammable coating from the area to be heated, or for shipbreaking you may burn it away under controlled conditions. See 1915.53(c).

  • Stripping removes the fuel source next to the hot work.
  • For shipbreaking only, the standard allows burning away coatings "under controlled conditions," but you must ensure the burning is done safely and with fire controls in place.

Under 1915.53(d)(1) what protection is required when welding in enclosed spaces on metal covered with toxic preservatives?

In enclosed spaces, you must either strip toxic preservatives at least 4 inches from the heat area or protect employees with air-line respirators that meet [1915.154]. See 1915.53(d)(1).

Under 1915.53(d)(2) what protection is required when working in the open air on surfaces covered with toxic preservatives?

In the open air, employees must be protected by a filter‑type respirator in accordance with the requirements of [1915.154]. See 1915.53(d)(2).

  • Employers should consult 1915.154 to select an appropriate filter cartridge and ensure the respirator program (fit testing, maintenance) is followed.
  • If a competent person determines the filter respirator is not adequate for the contaminant or concentrations, supplied-air may still be required (Competent person requirements in shipyards).

Under 1915.53(e)(1) what testing is required before hot work in enclosed spaces on metal covered with soft and greasy preservatives?

A competent person must test the atmosphere in the enclosed space to ensure it does not contain explosive vapors before any welding, cutting, or heating begins. See 1915.53(e)(1).

Under 1915.53(e)(2) what must you do if explosive vapors are found before hot work?

If explosive vapors are found, no hot work shall be commenced until precautions are taken so the welding, cutting, or heating can be done safely. See 1915.53(e)(2).

  • Precautions can include ventilating and purging the space, removing preservative coatings, or other measures that a competent person determines will make the operation safe (Competent person requirements in shipyards).
  • The prohibition in 1915.34(b)(2) also applies, so follow that section's controls on hot work in dangerous atmospheres.

Under 1915.53(e)(2) how far must preservative coatings be removed around the heated area?

Preservative coatings must be removed for a sufficient distance so that the temperature of the unstripped metal will not be appreciably raised by the hot work. See 1915.53(e)(2).

  • The standard does not prescribe a single distance; the removal extent depends on the work, heat input, and metal thickness.
  • You may use artificial cooling of surrounding metal to limit the area that must be cleaned, per 1915.53(e)(2).

Under 1915.53(f) how often must the atmosphere be tested when welding in enclosed spaces on soft and greasy preservatives?

A competent person must test immediately after hot work begins and at frequent intervals thereafter to ensure no flammable vapors are being produced; if vapors are found, stop the work immediately. See 1915.53(f).

  • The competent person should decide the testing frequency based on hazards and past test results (Competent person requirements in shipyards).
  • If tests show flammable vapors, operations must be stopped until additional precautions render the work safe per 1915.53(f).

Where does the fire hose requirement for hot work appear and what is required?

The requirement that a 1½ inch or larger fire hose with a fog nozzle be uncoiled, placed under pressure, and immediately available in the immediate vicinity of hot work is part of the welding and preservative coatings rules at [1915.53]. See 1915.53.

  • The hose must be ready for instant use while being positioned to avoid freezing.
  • This is a minimum equipment readiness requirement; employers should also use other fire control measures as appropriate.

Under 1915.53(a) do paragraphs (e) and (f) apply to shipbreaking?

No—paragraphs (e) and (f) apply to ship repairing and shipbuilding but do not apply to shipbreaking. See 1915.53(a).

  • Shipbreaking still must follow other applicable parts of 1915.53, such as testing flammability under 1915.53(b) and stripping highly flammable coatings under 1915.53(c).

Under 1915.53(e)(2) can you use artificial cooling to reduce the area that must be stripped of preservatives?

Yes, artificial cooling of the metal surrounding the heated area may be used to limit the size of the area that must be cleaned. See 1915.53(e)(2).

  • Cooling lowers heat spread and therefore reduces how far coatings must be removed to prevent the unstripped metal from being appreciably heated.
  • Use cooling methods that a competent person approves and that keep the worksite safe.

Under 1915.53(d)(1) may an employer rely on a competent person to determine what protection is necessary for toxic preservatives?

Yes — a competent person may determine and specify the necessary protection for hazardous exposures, including whether to strip coatings or provide respirators. See 1915.53(d)(1) and the Competent person requirements in shipyards interpretation.

  • The competent person must be capable of recognizing hazards and specifying protections as required by Part 1915 (Competent person requirements in shipyards).
  • Their decision should follow the respirator requirements in 1915.154 where respirators are used.

Under 1915.53(d)(2) what does "filter type respirator" mean and where do I find the program requirements?

A "filter type respirator" means a negative-pressure respirator that uses cartridges or filters to remove contaminants; program requirements (selection, fit testing, maintenance) are in [1915.154]. See 1915.53(d)(2) and 1915.154.

  • Use the cartridge/filter appropriate for the contaminant(s) and concentrations.
  • Follow the respiratory protection program elements in 1915.154 (medical evaluation, fit testing, training, cleaning, and maintenance).

Under 1915.53(e)(1) what instruments or methods should a competent person use to test for explosive vapors?

A competent person should use appropriate detection instruments (for example, a combustible gas indicator or explosion monitor) and recognized sampling procedures to verify the atmosphere does not contain explosive vapors, as required by [1915.53(e)(1)]. See 1915.53(e)(1) and consult the Competent person requirements in shipyards for competency expectations.

  • Instruments should be calibrated and appropriate for the preservation solvents or vapors expected.
  • If readings indicate explosive concentrations, do not start hot work until the area is made safe per 1915.53(e)(2).

Under 1915.53(f) who must stop hot work if flammable vapors are produced during welding in an enclosed space?

If a competent person's tests show flammable vapors are being produced, the operation must be stopped immediately; work cannot resume until additional precautions make the operation safe. See 1915.53(f).

  • The competent person conducts the tests and communicates results; employers are responsible for stopping work and implementing corrective actions (Competent person requirements in shipyards).
  • Corrective steps may include ventilation, further stripping, cooling, or changing work methods.

Under 1915.53(b) if a coating's flammability is unknown, may hot work begin before testing?

No — if flammability is unknown, a competent person must first test the coating before welding, cutting, or heating begins. See 1915.53(b).

  • Do not start hot work on a coated surface until the competent person has determined the coating's flammability and appropriate precautions are in place.
  • If testing shows the coating is highly flammable, follow 1915.53(c).

Under 1915.53(c) during shipbreaking the standard allows burning away highly flammable coatings—does that remove the need for other controls?

No — even when burning away coatings during shipbreaking is allowed under 1915.53(c), employers must perform the burning under controlled, safe conditions and use appropriate fire controls and respiratory protections as needed.

  • "Controlled conditions" means the employer must plan the burn, provide fire suppression (e.g., the required hose), and prevent hazards to workers and property.
  • Use a competent person to plan and supervise the operation (Competent person requirements in shipyards).

Under 1915.53(e)(2) does the prohibition in 1915.34(b)(2) apply to hot work near preservatives?

Yes — the prohibition in 1915.34(b)(2) applies when doing hot work near preservatives, as referenced in 1915.53(e)(2).

  • Follow the controls in 1915.34(b)(2) for hot work in atmospheres that could become hazardous.
  • Use competent-person testing and take required corrective measures before resuming hot work.

Under 1915.53(d)(1) can removing only 4 inches of coating around the weld be enough for enclosed spaces with toxic preservatives?

Yes—1915.53(d)(1) requires stripping toxic coatings for at least 4 inches from the heat area in enclosed spaces, unless you instead protect employees with air-line respirators meeting 1915.154.

  • The 4-inch minimum is explicit for toxic preservatives in enclosed spaces per 1915.53(d)(1).
  • If you believe more removal is necessary based on the coating, metal thickness, or heat input, a competent person should make that determination (Competent person requirements in shipyards).

Under 1915.53 which respirator type is required in enclosed spaces when coatings are toxic and cannot be stripped?

When toxic preservatives cannot be stripped in an enclosed space, air‑line (supplied‑air) respirators meeting [1915.154] are required. See 1915.53(d)(1) and 1915.154.

  • Supplied‑air respirators provide a clean breathing source independent of the contaminated atmosphere in the space.
  • Ensure your respirator program follows the procedures and protections in 1915.154 (medical evaluation, fit testing, training, etc.).

Under 1915.53(e)(1) can the competent person use TLVs or other non-OSHA limits to judge hazard when OSHA PELs are not available?

Yes — a competent person may use recognized occupational exposure limits (such as ACGIH TLVs) or other objective data to evaluate hazards where OSHA PELs do not exist, provided they are capable of specifying necessary protections. See 1915.53(e)(1) and the Competent person requirements in shipyards interpretation.

  • The competent person must be able to recognize and evaluate exposures and specify protections as required by Part 1915 (Competent person requirements in shipyards).
  • Document the basis for protective measures and keep monitoring records as appropriate.