OSHA AI Agent
Get instant answers to any safety question.
Request Demo
OSHA 1917.93

Head protection requirements

1917 Subpart E

13 Questions & Answers
10 Interpretations

Questions & Answers

Under 1917.93(a), when must an employer ensure that employees wear protective helmets?

Employees must wear protective helmets when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects. This is the specific requirement in 1917.93(a); employers must identify such areas and ensure affected employees wear helmets.

  • See the full head protection rule at 1917.93 for context.

Under 1917.93(b)(1), which consensus standards are acceptable for head protection?

Head protection must comply with any one of the ANSI standards listed in the rule: ANSI Z89.1-2009, ANSI Z89.1-2003, or ANSI Z89.1-1997. The regulation lists these options explicitly in 1917.93(b)(1)(i), 1917.93(b)(1)(ii), and 1917.93(b)(1)(iii).

  • See 1917.93(b) for the list and placement in the standard.

Under 1917.93(b)(2), can an employer use head protection that is not built to the listed ANSI standards?

Yes—an employer may use head protection not built to those ANSI versions if the employer can demonstrate the device is at least as effective as devices constructed to one of the listed consensus standards. That allowance is in 1917.93(b)(2).

  • The standard places the burden on the employer to demonstrate equivalence; the rule itself does not prescribe the exact form of that demonstration, so employers should retain documentation (test data, manufacturer statements, or third-party certification) showing equal or better protection.

Under 1917.93(c), what must an employer do before issuing a previously worn protective hat to another employee?

The employer must clean and disinfect any protective hat that was previously worn before issuing it to another employee. This requirement is stated directly in 1917.93(c).

  • Employers should follow manufacturer cleaning instructions or established disinfecting procedures to ensure effective cleaning and to avoid damaging the helmet.

Under 1917.93 and related PPE payment rules, must an employer provide protective helmets at no cost to employees?

Yes—when the employer requires head protection under the standard, the employer generally must provide the protective helmets at no cost to employees. OSHA's final rule on employer payment for PPE applies to Part 1917 and requires employers to pay for PPE they require, with limited exceptions; see OSHA's interpretation on employee PPE payment methods at https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2014-11-13 and the head protection rule at 1917.93.

  • The 2014 interpretation explains that employers may retain ownership of PPE and may require return on termination, and may use deposit systems that do not result in an involuntary cost to the employee.
  • Employers may not charge employees for wear and tear to PPE that is related to the work performed or workplace conditions.

Under 1917.93 and the PPE payment interpretation, can an employer require a deposit for an issued protective helmet?

Yes—an employer may require a deposit for PPE if the employer retains ownership of the equipment, but the deposit system must not result in the employee involuntarily paying for PPE required by the employer. OSHA's guidance on employer PPE payment methods explains this approach and cautions against systems that circumvent the payment rule; see https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2014-11-13 and 1917.93.

  • A written agreement clarifying expectations is an effective method, and employers must not charge employees for work-related wear and tear.

Under 1917.93(b), are bump caps or non-ANSI "soft" head coverings compliant head protection?

Only head protection that meets one of the listed consensus standards or that the employer demonstrates is at least as effective will be deemed compliant. Therefore, a bump cap or soft head covering is compliant only if it meets the ANSI standards listed in 1917.93(b)(1) or the employer can demonstrate equivalent protection under 1917.93(b)(2).

  • Many bump caps do not meet ANSI Z89.1 impact standards; check manufacturer certification or test data before relying on them for compliance.

Under 1917.93, can an employer reissue helmets to other employees if they have been sanitized but are otherwise worn?

Yes—an employer may reissue previously worn helmets to other employees provided they are cleaned and disinfected prior to reissuance as required by 1917.93(c).

  • Employers should inspect reissued helmets for damage or degradation and follow manufacturer guidance to ensure the helmet still provides required protection.

Under 1917.93(b)(2), who bears the burden of showing that an alternative head protection device is as effective as an ANSI-certified helmet?

The employer bears the burden of demonstrating that the alternative head protection device is at least as effective as devices constructed to one of the listed consensus standards. That employer responsibility is set out in 1917.93(b)(2).

  • While the standard does not prescribe a specific method, reasonable documentation such as laboratory test reports, third-party certifications, or detailed manufacturer engineering data is appropriate to retain as proof of equivalence.

Under 1917.93, may an employer require employees to pay for replacement helmets lost after issuance?

Employers may take reasonable steps to retrieve employer-owned PPE and may require payment for employer-owned PPE not returned at termination, but they may not charge employees for wear and tear related to work; see OSHA's PPE payment guidance at https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2014-11-13 and the head protection rule 1917.93.

  • If the PPE was employer-owned and lost, the employer's actions must comply with federal, state, and local pay-deduction laws and must not effectively force an employee to pay for required PPE.

Under 1917.93, does the head protection requirement apply at a designated waterfront facility?

Possibly not—Part 1917's specific requirements, including those in 1917.93, may not apply to a facility that meets the regulatory definition of a "designated waterfront facility." OSHA's interpretation about applicability to designated waterfront facilities explains that certain Part 1917 requirements do not apply in that situation; see https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2017-05-31.

  • Employers operating at a designated waterfront facility should confirm which OSHA part governs their operations and which specific standards apply.

Under 1917.93, if an employer modifies a helmet (for example, adds accessories), does it affect compliance?

Modifying a helmet can affect its compliance because 1917.93(b) requires that head protection meet the listed standards or be demonstrated equivalent; any modification that alters protective performance may make the helmet noncompliant. Employers must ensure that any accessory or modification does not reduce protective capability and should document manufacturer approval or testing showing continued compliance.

  • When in doubt, obtain written manufacturer approval or third-party testing to verify that the modified helmet remains at least as effective as an ANSI-certified device.

Under 1917.93, does the employer have to document the cleaning and disinfection of reissued helmets?

The standard requires cleaning and disinfecting previously worn protective hats before issuing them to another employee (1917.93(c)), but it does not specify recordkeeping for that cleaning; however, keeping simple documentation of cleaning and inspection is a prudent compliance and hygiene practice.

  • Employers should follow manufacturer cleaning instructions and retain any records if internal policies or other standards require proof of PPE maintenance.