OSHA AI Agent
Get instant answers to any safety question.
Request Demo
OSHA 1918.105

Protective clothing and PFDs

1918 Subpart J

19 Questions & Answers
10 Interpretations

Questions & Answers

Under 1918.105(a)(1), when must an employer provide and require special protective clothing?

The employer must provide and require special protective clothing whenever employees are doing work where protective clothing is necessary to protect them from hazards. Employers are obligated under 1918.105(a)(1) to both supply and enforce use of special protective clothing for employees engaged in tasks that present a need for such clothing.

Under 1918.105(a)(2), must protective clothing be cleaned or disinfected before giving it to another employee?

Yes. Protective clothing that will be reissued must be cleaned and disinfected when necessary before it is given to another employee. The regulation states that "when necessary, protective clothing shall be cleaned and disinfected before reissuance" under 1918.105(a)(2). You should follow manufacturer guidance and any workplace infection-control procedures when cleaning and disinfecting.

Under 1918.105(b)(1), in what work situations must the employer provide and require wearing of personal flotation devices (PFDs)?

The employer must provide and require PFDs for any employee engaged in work in which the employee might fall into the water. The rule is explicit in 1918.105(b)(1)—if a worker could fall into water during their tasks, the employer must supply and enforce wearing an appropriate PFD.

Under 1918.105(b)(2), what types of PFDs are acceptable for longshoring and marine terminal work?

Acceptable PFDs are those that are United States Coast Guard (USCG) approved (Type I, II, III, or V) and are marked for use as a work vest, for commercial use, or for use on vessels. The standard requires USCG-approved devices per 1918.105(b)(2). Make sure each PFD has the appropriate USCG approval markings and any additional markings such as "work vest" or "commercial use."

Under 1918.105(b)(3), how do you know when a PFD is unserviceable and must be taken out of service?

A PFD is unserviceable when it is damaged in a way that affects its buoyancy or its fastening capability. The standard defines unserviceable condition as damage that compromises buoyancy or fastening in 1918.105(b)(3). Inspect PFDs regularly and remove any device with torn fabric that exposes flotation material, ruptured bladders (for inflatable types), broken buckles or straps, or any other damage that could prevent it from keeping a person afloat or secured.

Under 1918.105(b)(2), can an employer allow employees to use recreational (non-commercial) PFDs?

Employees may use PFDs only if the device is USCG-approved and marked for commercial/vessel use or as a work vest; recreational-only devices that lack appropriate USCG commercial markings do not meet the standard. 1918.105(b)(2) requires USCG approval and marking for work or commercial use, so recreational PFDs without those markings are not acceptable for covered maritime work.

Under 1918.105(b)(2), are inflatable PFDs allowed for longshoring if they are USCG-approved?

Yes—inflatable PFDs are allowed only if they are USCG-approved under the appropriate USCG classification (for example, as a Type V or other approved type) and are marked for use in commercial or vessel operations. The rule requires that PFDs meet USCG approval and marking criteria in 1918.105(b)(2). Follow the manufacturer's service and inspection guidance for inflatables because they have specific maintenance and inflation-system checks.

Under 1918.105, who is responsible for maintaining PFDs in safe condition and removing unserviceable units?

The employer is responsible for maintaining PFDs in safe condition and ensuring unserviceable devices are taken out of service. The standard states that "Personal flotation devices shall be maintained in safe condition and shall be considered unserviceable when damaged" in 1918.105(b)(3). Employers should establish inspection, maintenance, and replacement procedures and train employees to report damaged PFDs.

Under 1918.105(a) and the 2014 OSHA interpretation on PPE payment, who must pay for required protective clothing and PFDs?

If protective clothing or PFDs are required by the employer for the job, the employer must provide and pay for them unless a specific regulatory exception applies. OSHA's payment interpretation explains that where the employer retains ownership of PPE and the PPE is required by the employer, the employer generally must provide it at no cost to the employee; reasonable deposit systems are allowed only if they do not make the employee involuntarily pay for PPE (see OSHA's Employee PPE payment methods interpretation and 1918.105(a)(1)).

Under 1918.105(a), can an employer require employees to return issued protective clothing at the end of employment and charge for unreturned items?

Yes, an employer may require return of employer-owned protective clothing and may take reasonable steps to recover employer property or charge for items the employee fails to return, provided the practice complies with federal, state, and local law and does not result in employees effectively paying for required PPE. OSHA's Employee PPE payment methods interpretation explains that employers may retain ownership and recover unreturned PPE, but they may not charge employees for wear and tear caused by workplace conditions.

Under 1918.105(a)(2), does the standard specify how to clean and disinfect protective clothing?

No—the standard does not prescribe specific cleaning methods, but it requires that protective clothing be cleaned and disinfected when necessary before reissuance (1918.105(a)(2)). Employers should follow manufacturer instructions and applicable infection-control guidance when cleaning garments and document procedures that ensure garments are safe to reissue.

Under 1918.105(b)(1), are visitors or contractors required to wear PFDs if they might fall into the water?

The regulation specifically requires that the employer provide and require PFDs for employees engaged in work where they might fall into water (1918.105(b)(1)). While the text refers to "each employee," employers should also protect non-employees (visitors, contractors) from hazards; as a best practice, provide and require appropriate PFDs for anyone exposed to fall‑into‑water risks on the worksite, even though the citation language focuses on employees.

Under 1918.105(b)(2), what markings should you look for on a PFD to confirm it meets the standard?

You should look for U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) approval markings and wording indicating the device is for use as a work vest, for commercial use, or for use on vessels. 1918.105(b)(2) requires PFDs to be USCG-approved pursuant to 46 CFR part 160 and to carry such markings; absence of those markings means the device does not meet the standard's requirement.

Under 1918.105(b)(3), may an employer repair a damaged PFD and return it to service?

Only repairs that restore a PFD to its original, USCG‑approved condition and do not affect buoyancy or fastening may be acceptable; any damage that affects buoyancy or fastening renders the PFD unserviceable and it must be taken out of service. The standard directs that PFDs be maintained in safe condition and treated as unserviceable when damage affects buoyancy or fastening capability (1918.105(b)(3)). Follow manufacturer guidance and USCG rules for approved repairs.

Under 1918.105, must employers establish inspection schedules for PFDs and protective clothing?

While 1918.105 does not specify exact inspection intervals, employers must maintain PFDs in safe condition and clean/disinfect protective clothing before reissuance, which implies a program of regular inspections. Implement a documented inspection and maintenance schedule tailored to the device type and work conditions to ensure compliance with 1918.105(a) and 1918.105(b)(3).

Under 1918.105(b)(2), are Type V PFDs acceptable for work use, and what should employers consider?

Type V PFDs may be acceptable if they are USCG‑approved for the specific work use and are marked appropriately; however, Type V devices are often for special uses and may not provide equivalent general buoyancy. The standard requires USCG approval and proper marking in 1918.105(b)(2), so employers must confirm the Type V device's approval covers the intended work task and follow manufacturer and USCG guidance.

Under 1918.105(a), can employers set more protective requirements than the standard for clothing and PFDs?

Yes. OSHA standards set minimum requirements and do not prevent employers from adopting more stringent protective clothing or PFD policies. The agency recognizes that employers can impose stricter controls to address workplace hazards beyond the baseline of 1918.105(a) and 1918.105(b). Implementing stricter PPE or inspection measures is a compliant and often prudent practice.

Under 1918.105 and the 2014 PPE payment interpretation, may an employer require a refundable deposit for issued PFDs?

Yes, an employer may use a deposit system as an incentive to ensure return of employer‑owned PFDs, provided the system does not result in employees effectively paying for required PPE and complies with applicable laws. OSHA's Employee PPE payment methods interpretation explains that deposit systems are acceptable if they don't circumvent the rule that employers provide required PPE at no cost; employers must avoid charging employees for wear and tear caused by workplace conditions.

Under 1918.105(b), do PFD fastening failures make a PFD unserviceable even if buoyancy is intact?

Yes. A PFD must be considered unserviceable if damage affects the fastening capability even if buoyancy is otherwise intact. The regulation explicitly states PFDs are unserviceable when damaged in a manner that affects buoyancy or fastening capability in 1918.105(b)(3); broken buckles, torn straps, or other fastening failures must be corrected or the PFD removed from service.