The Chairman of the Board must give notice of investigational hearings. The rule in 1922.5 states that "The Chairman of the Board shall give reasonable notice of the time and place of any investigational hearing...".
The notice must give reasonable notice of the time and place of the investigational hearing. The text of 1922.5 requires the Chairman to give reasonable notice of the time and place of any investigational hearing, but it does not list additional required contents.
Notice must be given to any person whose conduct is or may be pertinent to the subjects of investigation, to any prospective witnesses, and to any Federal or State agency engaged in similar investigative work. This list of recipients is stated directly in 1922.5.
Yes — the rule requires notice to persons whose conduct "is or may be pertinent" to the subjects of investigation. 1922.5 uses the phrase "is or may be pertinent," which includes those whose involvement is uncertain.
Yes — prospective witnesses must be given reasonable notice of the time and place of investigational hearings. The requirement to notify "prospective witnesses" appears explicitly in 1922.5.
Yes — any Federal or State agency engaged in similar investigative work must be given reasonable notice of investigational hearings. This is specified in 1922.5.
No — 1922.5 requires "reasonable notice" but does not define a specific timeframe or method for that notice. The text of 1922.5 uses the term without specifying exact parameters.
No — 1922.5 requires reasonable notice of the time and place of an investigational hearing but does not require that the notice state the subjects of the investigation. The section reads that the Chairman shall give reasonable notice "of the time and place of any investigational hearing" to listed recipients, without requiring the subjects to be specified in the notice (1922.5).
The rule requires notice to any person whose conduct "is or may be pertinent," but 1922.5 does not define that phrase. The requirement to notify such persons is stated in 1922.5, and the section itself does not provide a definition for who exactly qualifies.
Yes — the term "any person" in 1922.5 covers private individuals and organizations, so they must be given reasonable notice if their conduct is or may be pertinent. The text of 1922.5 requires notice to "any person whose conduct is or may be pertinent" without limiting the category to government entities.
No — 1922.5 requires reasonable notice but does not specify the method of delivery. The section simply states the Chairman "shall give reasonable notice of the time and place of any investigational hearing" without prescribing how that notice must be sent (1922.5).
The regulation requires that reasonable notice include the place of the investigational hearing, but it does not set rules about where hearings must be held. 1922.5 specifically requires reasonable notice "of the time and place of any investigational hearing."
No — 1922.5 does not describe consequences or remedies if notice is not given. The section simply states the notice requirement; it does not include enforcement steps or sanctions for failure to provide notice (1922.5).
1922.5 requires that "The Chairman of the Board shall give reasonable notice," but the section does not say whether that duty may be delegated. The text of 1922.5 states the duty without addressing delegation.