Under 1952.13(a), when did the Michigan State plan receive initial OSHA approval?
The Michigan State plan received initial approval on October 3, 1973. See 1952.13(a).
Subpart A
The Michigan State plan received initial approval on October 3, 1973. See 1952.13(a).
Yes—OSHA entered into an operational status agreement with Michigan. See 1952.13(b).
The approved revised benchmarks were 56 safety compliance officers and 45 health compliance officers, and the Assistant Secretary approved these staffing levels on April 20, 1995. See 1952.13(c).
Staffing benchmarks were required to establish the levels of compliance staffing necessary for a "fully effective" enforcement program under the 1978 Court Order in AFL-CIO v. Marshall. See 1952.13(c).
The Michigan plan covers all private‑sector employers and employees (with several notable exceptions) and State and local government employers and employees within Michigan. See 1952.13(d).
For current information on exceptions and additional plan details, review the Michigan State plan information referenced in 1952.13(d).
Part 1952 is titled "Approved State Plans for Enforcement of State Standards" and lists approved State plans for private‑sector and State and local government employees. See 1952.
No—OSHA does not generally consider diluted raw sewage and typical wastewater to be OPIM under the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard unless the material is visibly contaminated with blood or otherwise meets the definition of OPIM. See OSHA's Letter of Interpretation on Bloodborne pathogens in wastewater.
Not automatically—employers must evaluate job classifications and tasks to determine if occupational exposure to blood or OPIM is reasonably anticipated; only those employees with occupational exposure (for example, first aid providers who may contact blood or workers handling used hypodermic needles) must be offered the hepatitis B vaccine. See OSHA's Letter of Interpretation on Bloodborne pathogens in wastewater.
Yes—based on the described scenario, the structure meets OSHA's definition of a spray booth. See OSHA's Letter of Interpretation on Spray booth standards inquiry.
Yes—if the structure meets the definition of a spray booth, it is required to be equipped with approved automatic sprinklers on the upstream and downstream sides of the filters. See OSHA's Letter of Interpretation on Spray booth standards inquiry.
Yes—a dry chemical extinguishing system or a carbon dioxide (gaseous agent) system may be used in place of an automatic sprinkler system if it is installed to meet OSHA requirements. See OSHA's Letter of Interpretation on Spray booth standards inquiry.
The storage of flammable materials for a spray booth must comply with the flammable and combustible liquids standard, specifically the requirements for inside storage rooms in 29 CFR 1910.106, as explained in the spray booth Letter of Interpretation. See OSHA's Letter of Interpretation on Spray booth standards inquiry.
Michigan completed a reassessment in conjunction with OSHA, proposed revised benchmarks, provided opportunity for public comment and service on the AFL‑CIO, and then had the Assistant Secretary approve the revised staffing requirements on April 20, 1995. See 1952.13(c).