OSHA AI Agent
Get instant answers to any safety question.
Request Demo
OSHA 1956.1

Purpose and scope

Subpart A

18 Questions & Answers

Questions & Answers

Under 1956.1(a), what is the main purpose of Part 1956?

The purpose of Part 1956 is to make the protections of the Occupational Safety and Health Act available to State and local government employees in States that do not have an approved private employee plan by setting procedures for State plans submitted under section 18. See the purpose statement in 1956.1(a) and the general Part 1902 framework for State plans.

Under 1956.1(a), which employees are covered when a State submits a plan under this part?

State and local government (public) employees are the ones covered when a State submits a plan under this part in a State that does not have an approved private employee plan. See 1956.1(a).

Under 1956.1(a), can a State submit a plan for any safety or health issue, or are there limits?

A State may submit a plan only for occupational safety and health issues for which a Federal standard has been promulgated under section 6 of the Act and that meet the definition of an "issue" in the regulations. See 1956.1(a) and the definition in 1902.2(c)

Under 1956.1(b), must State plans covering public employers always use monetary penalties to gain compliance?

No — State plans covering public employers do not always have to rely on monetary penalties as the primary enforcement tool; the regulation advises consideration of other approaches because monetary penalties may not be appropriate in every public sector context. See the guidance in 1956.1(b).

Under 1956.1, how should procedures for public-employee State plans be adapted compared to private-employee plans?

Procedures for public-employee State plans should be adapted to reflect differences between public and private employment, including adjustments for the lack of typical Federal enforcement authority over public employers. The part directs States to adapt private-employee plan procedures as appropriate. See 1956.1(a) and 1956.1(b).

Under 1956.1(a), when does a State plan cover an occupational category in public employment?

A State plan covers an occupational category in public employment when Federal standards are in effect with regard to hazards found in that public employment and the category qualifies as an "issue" under the regulations. See 1956.1(a) and the definition in 1902.2.

Under 1956.1, what role does 1902 play in approving and evaluating a State plan submitted under section 18?

Section 1902 provides the general procedures and standards that govern the approval, continued evaluation, and operation of State plans; those procedures are adapted for plans submitted under section 18 as described in Part 1956. See 1902 and 1956.1(a).

Under 1956.1(a), can a State use this part to extend coverage to private employees?

No — Part 1956 is intended for State plans that provide protections to State and local government employees where there is no approved private employee plan; it does not authorize using this part to extend coverage to private employees. See 1956.1(a).

Under 1956.1(a), does section 18 allow a State to submit a plan for an occupational hazard that has no Federal standard?

No — section 18(b) permits States to submit plans only for occupational safety and health issues for which a Federal standard has been promulgated under section 6; therefore the hazard must have a corresponding Federal standard. See 1956.1(a) and the related 1902.2.

Under 1956.1 and 1902.2(c), how is the word "issue" defined for State plan submissions?

An "issue" for State plan submissions is defined as any industrial, occupational, or hazard grouping that is administratively practicable and not in conflict with the purposes of the Act; this definition appears in 1902.2(c) and is cited by 1956.1(a).

Under 1956.1(b), how should a State account for lack of Federal enforcement authority when creating a public-employee plan?

A State should adjust private-employee plan procedures to account for the lack of Federal enforcement authority over public employers by choosing enforcement tools and administrative processes appropriate for public-sector contexts. See the discussion in 1956.1(b).

Under 1956.1, are States required to adopt Federal standards verbatim when creating a public-employee plan?

States are required to provide protections consistent with the Act and Federal standards, but Part 1956 specifically provides for adapting the procedures and requirements to the public-employee context rather than demanding verbatim adoption in every case. See 1956.1(a) and 1956.1(b).

Under 1956.1(a), who benefits from a State plan approved under section 18 when there is no private-employee plan in effect?

Public employees — State and local government workers — benefit from an approved State plan under section 18 when no private-employee plan is in effect, because it assures them the Act's protections. See 1956.1(a).

Under 1956.1(b), does the regulation say federal enforcement authority applies to public employers?

No — the regulation notes that the lack of federal enforcement authority over public employers requires adjustments when adapting private-employee plan procedures for public-employee plans. See 1956.1(b).

Under 1956.1, what kinds of adjustments might be considered because public employment differs from private employment?

Adjustments might include alternative compliance mechanisms, different penalty structures, or administrative processes tailored to public-sector governance, since monetary penalties and typical federal enforcement approaches may not be appropriate in all cases. The regulation advises consideration of these differences in 1956.1(b).

Under 1956.1(a), how does this part relate to the general policies in 1902 for State plans?

This part adapts the general procedures and requirements in 1902 for the special situation where a State plan under section 18 covers only public employees; it uses 1902's framework but modifies it as needed for public-sector application. See 1956.1(a) and 1902.

Under 1956.1(a), must the occupational category in a State plan be identical to Federal categories, or can it be grouped differently?

The occupational category must qualify as an "issue" that is administratively practicable and not in conflict with the Act; that allows States flexibility to group occupations or hazards in a way that is administratively practicable while still aligning with applicable Federal standards. See 1956.1(a) and the definition of "issue" in 1902.2(c).

Under 1956.1, what statutory authority allows States to submit plans that cover public employees?

States may submit plans covering public employees under section 18(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, a point reflected in the procedural framework adopted by Part 1956. See 1956.1(a) and the general 1902 framework.