OSHA AI Agent
Get instant answers to any safety question.
Request Demo
OSHA 1960.16

Compliance with OSHA standards

Subpart C

14 Questions & Answers
10 Interpretations

Questions & Answers

Under 1960.16, must the head of each federal agency follow OSHA standards issued under section 6 of the Act?

Yes. Each agency head must comply with all occupational safety and health standards issued under section 6 of the Act. The rule in 1960.16 explicitly requires agency heads to comply with section 6 standards or with alternate standards issued under Part 1960.

  • See the text in 1960.16 for the requirement that agencies comply with section 6 standards or approved alternate standards.

Under 1960.16, can a federal agency set more stringent permissible exposure limits (PELs) or threshold limit values (TLVs) than OSHA's section 6 standards without going through the alternate-standard approval process in 1960.17?

Yes. An agency may, after prior notification to the Secretary, prescribe and enforce more stringent PELs or TLVs and may require more frequent monitoring without using the approval procedures in 1960.17. The text of 1960.16 allows agencies to adopt stricter exposure limits upon prior notification to the Secretary.

  • Note that after receiving notification, the Secretary retains discretion to require the agency to follow the approval procedures in 1960.17 for any such change.

Under 1960.16, may an agency adopt the latest edition of an external reference standard if it is more stringent than the corresponding section 6 standard, and what steps are required first?

Yes. After consultation with employees and safety and health committees and upon prior notification to the Secretary, an agency may utilize the latest edition of a reference standard if it is more stringent than the section 6 standard. 1960.16 permits use of updated external standards following employee consultation and prior notification to the Secretary.

  • Be aware that the Secretary may thereafter require the agency to follow the approval procedures in 1960.17 for any of these actions.
  • The agency should document the employee consultation and the notification to the Secretary to show compliance with 1960.16.

Under 1960.16, does prior notification to the Secretary remove all possible follow-up from OSHA after an agency adopts a stricter standard or a newer reference edition?

No. Prior notification does not eliminate the Secretary's authority to require formal approval procedures. 1960.16 states that after notification the Secretary may require the use of the approval procedures in 1960.17 for any of the described situations.

  • Practically, agencies should assume that notification may trigger a request for more documentation and should be prepared to follow the alternate-standard application requirements in 1960.17 if requested.

Under 1960.16, does the rule specify how an agency must notify the Secretary when prescribing a more stringent exposure level or adopting a newer reference standard?

No. 1960.16 requires prior notification to the Secretary but does not set out a detailed procedural form or specific method for that notification. The regulation states the agency must provide prior notification before prescribing or adopting the more stringent measures.

  • If the Secretary requests formal approval procedures, the agency would then follow the information and steps described in 1960.17.
  • Agencies should retain records of their consultation with employees and the notification to the Secretary to demonstrate compliance with 1960.16.

Under 1960.16, are federal civilian contractor employees working on DoD installations covered by OSHA standards?

Yes for civilian contractor employees doing non-unique military work. OSHA coverage of workplaces on military installations depends on whether the work, equipment, or operations are 'uniquely military.' The OSHA letter on oxygen-deficient atmospheres explains that while military personnel and uniquely military systems are excluded from OSHA coverage, civilian employees and private contractors working on equipment, systems, and operations that are not uniquely military are covered. See the interpretation "Oxygen-deficient atmospheres in HVAC" and 1960.16.

  • The letter clarifies how Executive Order 12196 and Part 1960 interact with OSHA coverage on military sites.
  • If contractor employees are performing work comparable to private-sector operations, OSHA standards generally apply to protect those civilian workers.

Under 1960.16, can an agency require more frequent exposure monitoring than an OSHA section 6 standard requires without seeking Secretary approval?

Yes. An agency may require more frequent monitoring of exposures without recourse to the approval procedures in 1960.17, provided the agency gives prior notification to the Secretary as described in 1960.16.

  • Remember that the Secretary may later require the agency to use the approval procedures in 1960.17 for any of these actions.
  • Agencies should document the reasons and the notification process when increasing monitoring frequency.

Under 1960.16, must an agency consult with employees and safety and health committees before adopting a newer reference standard?

Yes. The regulation specifies that an agency may utilize the latest edition of a reference standard only after consultation with employees and safety and health committees and after prior notification to the Secretary. This requirement is stated in 1960.16.

  • The consultation should be meaningful and documented so the agency can show it involved employees and committees in the decision to adopt the newer, more stringent edition.

Under 1960.16, if an agency adopts a more stringent exposure limit without approval, could OSHA later reject that change and require the formal alternate-standard process in 1960.17?

Yes. While the agency may initially adopt a more stringent limit upon prior notification, 1960.16 authorizes the Secretary to require use of the approval procedures in 1960.17 after notification. That means OSHA can ask the agency to submit the matter formally under the alternate-standard process if the Secretary deems it necessary.

  • Agencies should be prepared to provide supporting data and follow 1960.17 if the Secretary requests it.

Under 1960.16 and the Hexavalent Chromium Letter (April 19, 2019), can a federal agency use an alternate sampling method (like an inhalable sampler) to show compliance with an OSHA PEL?

Yes, provided the alternate sampling and analytical method meet the accuracy and statistical performance requirements of the applicable OSHA standard. The April 19, 2019 letter on Hexavalent chromium sampling methods explains that paragraph (d)(5) of 29 CFR 1910.1026 is a performance-based requirement, and an inhalable sampling technique is acceptable if it can measure chromium (VI) with the required accuracy and confidence. This interpretation notes that requesting an alternate standard under 1960.17 is a separate process if the agency intends to implement a different numeric standard.

  • If an agency uses an alternate method, it must demonstrate the method meets the standard's performance criteria and may use those results to determine compliance with the OSHA PEL, per the Hexavalent chromium letter.

Under 1960.16, does adopting a more stringent internal standard free an agency from complying with other applicable OSHA standards?

No. Adopting a more stringent internal standard under 1960.16 does not exempt the agency from compliance with other applicable OSHA standards. The agency must still meet all relevant OSHA regulatory requirements. Other letters in the record emphasize that exclusion from one specific OSHA standard does not eliminate obligations under other standards (for example, see the lockout/tagout interpretation at https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2012-04-03).

  • Agencies must ensure their internal standards and practices integrate with the full set of applicable OSHA regulations and the federal agency obligations under Part 1960.

Under 1960.16, if an agency adopts the latest edition of an industry standard (e.g., ANSI or ASHRAE) because it is more protective, how might OSHA use industry standards during enforcement?

OSHA may cite applicable OSHA regulations directly, and it may reference industry standards like ANSI or ASHRAE as evidence of hazard recognition or feasible abatement when an OSHA standard does not directly address the hazard. The ANSI window cleaning interpretation (March 28, 2005) explains that OSHA does not cite non-adopted ANSI standards themselves but can use them to support citations under broader requirements such as section 5(a)(1) or the federal equivalent 1960.8 for federal agencies. See the interpretation at https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2005-03-28-0 and 1960.16.

  • If an agency's adopted edition is more protective, that fact can strengthen the agency's defense that it provided effective protections, but OSHA can still require formal approval under 1960.17 if it asks for it.

Under 1960.16, does OSHA apply the same 'oxygen-deficient atmosphere' definition to DoD facilities and military personnel?

Not uniformly. The OSHA interpretation "Oxygen-deficient atmospheres in HVAC" explains that military personnel and uniquely military equipment and operations are excluded from OSHA coverage under Executive Order 12196 and Part 1960. Where civilian employees are covered (including contractors and non-unique military systems), OSHA's Respiratory Protection Standard, 29 CFR 1910.134, applies, including the definition of "oxygen-deficient atmosphere." Thus the definition applies to civilian employees covered by OSHA but generally not to uniquely military personnel and systems.

  • The letter clarifies that civilian employees working on non-unique systems on military installations fall under OSHA standards, while uniquely military systems and military personnel are typically excluded.

Under 1960.16, if an agency plans to implement an alternate standard instead of a section 6 standard, what regulation governs the approval process?

The approval process for alternate standards is governed by 1960.17. While 1960.16 allows agencies to adopt more stringent measures with prior notification, 1960.17 sets out the formal alternate-standard application and approval requirements if an agency seeks to use an alternative in lieu of the OSHA section 6 standard.

  • The Hexavalent chromium interpretation (April 19, 2019) notes that if an agency seeks to implement an alternate standard, it must follow the application steps described in 1960.17. See https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2019-04-19 for practical context.