OSHA AI Agent
Get instant answers to any safety question.
Request Demo
OSHA 1989.107

Administrative hearing procedures

1989 Subpart B

15 Questions & Answers

Questions & Answers

Under 1989.107(a), when do the rules of practice and procedure for administrative hearings before the Office of Administrative Law Judges apply?

The rules of practice and procedure in subpart A of part 18 apply to proceedings under this part unless this part provides otherwise. See 1989.107(a) for the statement that proceedings will follow those Office of Administrative Law Judges rules except where this part provides different procedures. This means you should consult 1989 and the ALJ rules in part 18 for procedural matters not specifically covered by 1989.107.

Under 1989.107(b), who assigns the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) after a timely objection and request for hearing is filed?

The Chief Administrative Law Judge will promptly assign the case to an ALJ after receipt of an objection and request for hearing. See 1989.107(b) which explains the Chief ALJ’s role in assignment and notification of hearing details.

Under 1989.107(b), what information must the ALJ provide to the parties once assigned?

The ALJ must notify the parties of the day, time, and place of the hearing once assigned. See 1989.107(b), which requires the ALJ to promptly notify parties of those hearing details.

Under 1989.107(b), how quickly must a hearing commence once an ALJ is assigned?

The hearing must commence expeditiously unless there is a showing of good cause or the parties agree otherwise. See 1989.107(b) which directs expeditious commencement but allows delay for good cause or party agreement.

Under 1989.107(b), can an ALJ limit discovery, and if so why?

Yes, an ALJ has broad discretion to limit discovery to expedite the hearing. See 1989.107(b), which expressly gives ALJs authority to restrict discovery when necessary to move the case forward quickly. Practical examples include shortening schedules for written requests or restricting depositions when they would unduly prolong the process.

Under 1989.107(b), what does it mean that hearings will be "conducted de novo on the record"?

It means the ALJ will consider the case anew based on the evidence and testimony presented at the hearing, rather than simply reviewing the prior agency decision. See 1989.107(b) which states hearings are conducted de novo on the record, so parties should be prepared to present the full factual and legal basis for their positions at the hearing.

Under 1989.107(c), what happens if both the complainant and the respondent file objections to the findings or order?

If both parties object, the objections will be consolidated and a single hearing will be conducted for both. See 1989.107(c) which requires consolidation in that situation.

Under 1989.107(d), do formal rules of evidence apply at these hearings?

No, formal rules of evidence do not apply, but principles that ensure the most probative evidence is produced will be used. See 1989.107(d) which explains that while the formal rules are not strictly applied, the ALJ will use established principles to get the most relevant and reliable evidence.

Under 1989.107(d), on what grounds may an ALJ exclude evidence?

An ALJ may exclude evidence that is immaterial, irrelevant, or unduly repetitious. See 1989.107(d) which identifies those specific grounds for exclusion to keep the hearing focused and efficient.

Under 1989.107(b), can parties agree to delay the hearing start date, and how is that addressed?

Yes, parties can agree to delay the hearing start date, and such an agreement will permit a non-expeditious start. See 1989.107(b) which states hearings are to commence expeditiously except upon a showing of good cause or when the parties otherwise agree.

Under 1989.107(a), where should you look for procedural rules not specifically covered in 1989.107?

You should consult the rules of practice and procedure for administrative hearings before the Office of Administrative Law Judges in subpart A of part 18 for procedures not provided in this part. See 1989.107(a) and the general 1989 page for context.

Under 1989.107(b), does the regulation require any specific timeline for the ALJ to notify parties after assignment?

The regulation requires the ALJ to promptly notify the parties of the hearing day, time, and place, but it does not set a specific number of days for that notice. See 1989.107(b) which uses the term "promptly" without prescribing a fixed deadline.

Under 1989.107(b), what does "good cause" relate to in the context of hearing scheduling?

"Good cause" allows delay of the hearing start beyond expeditious scheduling when a party shows a legitimate reason for delay. See 1989.107(b); examples of good cause commonly include illness, unavailable key witnesses, or other unforeseen events that would unfairly prejudice a party if the hearing proceeded as scheduled.

Under 1989.107(d), how should parties present evidence to avoid exclusion as unduly repetitious?

Parties should focus on offering the most probative and non-duplicative evidence and avoid submitting multiple documents or witnesses that add no new information. See 1989.107(d) which authorizes the ALJ to exclude evidence that is immaterial, irrelevant, or unduly repetitious to keep the record concise and focused.

Under 1989.107(b), can the ALJ control discovery timing and scope to prevent delay?

Yes, the ALJ can limit both the timing and scope of discovery to prevent unnecessary delay and expedite the hearing. See 1989.107(b), which gives ALJs broad discretion to restrict discovery when needed to move the case forward efficiently.