OSHA AI Agent
Get instant answers to any safety question.
Request Demo
OSHA 2200.95

Oral argument procedures

25 Questions & Answers
1 Interpretations

Questions & Answers

Under 2200.95(a), when will the Commission order oral argument and when should I file a motion requesting it?

The Commission may order oral argument either on its own motion or after a party files a motion, and motions for oral argument are normally considered only after all briefs are filed. See 2200.95(a).

  • File a motion for oral argument only after your briefs are submitted unless there is an exceptional reason to request earlier consideration.
  • Your motion should explain why oral argument would help resolve the issues before the Commission.

Under 2200.95(b), what notice will the Executive Secretary give about an oral argument?

The Executive Secretary will notify all parties whether oral argument will be heard and, within a reasonable time before argument, will inform the parties of the time, place, issues to be heard, and the time allotted. See 2200.95(b).

  • Expect formal notice specifying logistics and the specific issues the Commission intends to hear.
  • If you need accommodations or have scheduling conflicts, raise them promptly after receiving this notice.

Under 2200.95(c)(1), what is the deadline for requesting a postponement of an oral argument?

Except under extraordinary circumstances, a request for postponement must be filed at least 10 days before the scheduled oral argument. See 2200.95(c)(1).

  • If you miss the 10‑day window, you must show extraordinary circumstances to justify a later request.
  • File the postponement motion promptly and explain the reason(s) in detail.

Under 2200.95(c)(2), how will the Executive Secretary notify parties of a postponement and new schedule?

The Executive Secretary must notify parties of a postponement in a manner that avoids unnecessary travel or inconvenience and must inform all parties of the new time and place for the oral argument. See 2200.95(c)(2).

  • Expect clear, timely notice so travel plans are not wasted.
  • If you do not receive prompt notification after a postponement, contact the Office of the Executive Secretary immediately.

Under 2200.95(d)(1), how is time for oral argument allocated and how do I request additional time?

The Commission sets the time for oral argument and counsel may request an enlargement of time by filing a motion reasonably in advance of the argument date. See 2200.95(d)(1).

  • File a timely motion explaining why extra time is needed and how much additional time you seek.
  • Be specific about the issues that require extra time so the Commission can decide fairly.

Under 2200.95(d)(2), who argues first at oral argument and how is order handled in cross-petitions?

Under the rule, the petitioning party argues first, and in cases with cross-petitions the Commission will inform parties in advance of the order of appearance. See 2200.95(d)(2).

  • Expect the petitioner to open unless the Commission provides a different order ahead of time.
  • If your case involves cross-petitions, look for the Commission’s pre-argument notice specifying the sequence.

Under 2200.95(d)(3), can I reserve time for rebuttal and are there limits on reserving substantive points?

You may reserve part of your allotted time for rebuttal, but in your opening argument you must present your case fairly and completely and must not reserve substantive points to make only during rebuttal. See 2200.95(d)(3).

  • Reserve time for brief rebuttal but present all essential substantive arguments in your opening.
  • Reserving key points solely for rebuttal is disfavored and may be interrupted by the Commission.

Under 2200.95(d)(4), may counsel read from a previously filed document during oral argument?

No—oral argument should emphasize and clarify the written briefs, and the Commission disfavors arguments that are read from previously filed documents. See 2200.95(d)(4).

  • Use oral argument to highlight and explain the key points from the briefs rather than reading them aloud.
  • Prepare concise, direct oral remarks and be ready to answer questions from the Commission.

Under 2200.95(d)(5), can the Commission interrupt or end my oral argument?

Yes—the Commission may interrupt counsel at any time for questioning or may terminate a party’s argument. See 2200.95(d)(5).

  • Be prepared for active questioning and concise answers.
  • Avoid exceeding your allotted time or dwelling on points the Commissioners have already addressed.

Under 2200.95(e), what happens if the opposing party fails to appear at oral argument?

If either party fails to appear, the party present may be allowed to proceed with its argument. See 2200.95(e).

  • If you plan to proceed in the other party’s absence, be prepared to present your full argument and respond to Commissioners’ questions.
  • If you are the absent party, notify the Executive Secretary as soon as possible to avoid adverse consequences.

Under 2200.95(f), how is time allotted when multiple consolidated cases are scheduled for oral argument?

Consolidated cases are treated as one case for allotting argument time unless the Commission directs otherwise. See 2200.95(f).

  • Plan your presentation to cover consolidated matters within the single time allocation.
  • If separate time is needed for distinct consolidated matters, move the Commission for different allocations well before the argument date.

Under 2200.95(g), what must multiple counsel do about dividing argument time and what notification is required?

Counsel representing the same side must agree on a fair division of the total time; if they fail to agree, the Commission will allocate the time, and the Commission must be notified of the names of counsel who will argue no later than 5 days before the argument. See 2200.95(g).

  • Coordinate among counsel in advance to avoid the Commission imposing a division.
  • If more than one counsel will argue, provide their names to the Commission at least 5 days before the hearing.

Under 2200.95(g), can the Commission limit the number of counsel who may speak for a party?

Yes—the Commission may, in its discretion, limit the number of counsel heard for each party or side in the argument. See 2200.95(g).

  • Be prepared to consolidate speaking roles if the Commission imposes limits.
  • Notify the Commission early if multiple counsel intend to participate to seek approval or avoid last-minute changes.

Under 2200.95(h)(1), may parties use exhibits at oral argument that were entered into evidence at the hearing?

Yes—parties may use exhibits that were introduced into evidence at the hearing. See 2200.95(h)(1).

  • If an exhibit is already in the record, you may display or reference it without extra notice.
  • For any visual aid not in the record, follow the separate notice requirements.

Under 2200.95(h)(1)–(2), what are the notice and objection rules if I want to use a visual aid not in the record at oral argument?

You must give written notice to opposing counsel 15 days before the argument if you intend to use a visual aid not part of the record, and any objections must be filed in writing and served on adverse parties at least 7 days before the argument. See 2200.95(h)(1) and 2200.95(h)(2).

  • Provide the written notice promptly and describe the visual aid and how it will be used.
  • Opposing parties must raise objections in writing at least 7 days before argument so they can be resolved beforehand.

Under 2200.95(h)(2), may a visual aid introduce new evidence at oral argument?

No—a visual aid may not introduce or rely upon facts or evidence that are not already part of the record. See 2200.95(h)(2).

  • If a visual aid contains new facts, it may be disallowed or objected to by opposing counsel.
  • To add new evidence, you must do so through the appropriate record-making procedures, not during oral argument.

Under 2200.95(h)(3)–(4), how do I arrange for non-document visual aids to be placed and removed in the hearing room?

If you plan to use visual aids or exhibits other than documents, you must arrange with the Executive Secretary to have them placed in the hearing room before the Commission convenes, and any visual aids not introduced into evidence must be removed after argument unless the Commission directs otherwise. See 2200.95(h)(3) and 2200.95(h)(4).

  • Coordinate logistics with the Executive Secretary in advance (delivery, setup time).
  • Plan to remove your non-record visual aids promptly after the hearing unless told otherwise.

Under 2200.95, what happens to visual aids not reclaimed after notice from the Executive Secretary?

If visual aids are not reclaimed within a reasonable time after notice is given by the Executive Secretary, they may be disposed of at the Executive Secretary’s discretion. See 2200.95.

  • Retrieve any non‑record visual aids promptly after notification to avoid disposal.
  • If disposal would cause loss of important materials, contact the Executive Secretary immediately to arrange pickup or preservation.

Under 2200.95(i)(1), are oral arguments recorded and who pays for the transcript?

Unless the Commission directs otherwise, oral arguments are electronically recorded and transcribed verbatim, and the Commission pays for the court reporter’s fees and for copies of the transcript received by it. See 2200.95(i)(1).

  • The official transcript becomes part of the Commission record.
  • Parties who want their own copies must obtain and pay for additional copies (see next item).

Under 2200.95(i)(2), how can parties or others obtain recordings or transcripts of oral argument?

Persons wishing to listen to recordings must arrange this with the Executive Secretary, and any party desiring a written copy of the transcript is responsible for securing and paying for its copy. See 2200.95(i)(2).

  • Contact the Office of the Executive Secretary to arrange listening to electronic recordings.
  • Order and pay for private copies of the transcript from the court reporter or transcription service.

Under 2200.95(i)(3), how are errors in the oral-argument transcript corrected?

Errors in the transcript may be corrected by the Commission on its own motion, by joint motion of the parties, or by motion of any party, and the motion must state the error and the correction. See 2200.95(i)(3).

  • File a motion identifying the specific transcript error and the correction requested.
  • The official transcript will be modified to reflect the Commission’s approved corrections.

Under 2200.95(j), can a party who failed to file a brief be heard at oral argument?

Generally no—a party that fails to file a brief shall not be heard at oral argument except by permission of the Commission. See 2200.95(j).

  • If you missed the briefing deadline, seek the Commission’s permission before oral argument if you want to be heard.
  • The Commission may deny permission and proceed without hearing from the late party.

Under 2200.95(k)(1)–(4), how does an amicus curiae obtain permission to participate in oral argument?

An amicus curiae must file a motion for leave to participate no later than 14 days before the scheduled oral argument, identify its interest, explain why participation is desirable, and any opposition to the motion must be filed within 10 days; participation is permitted only with the Commission’s leave. See 2200.95(k)(1), 2200.95(k)(2), 2200.95(k)(3), and 2200.95(k)(4).

  • File the amicus motion at least 14 days before argument and explain clearly the amicus interest and reasons for participation.
  • Expect that participation will usually be limited to the time allotted to the party the amicus supports, unless the Commission exceptionally grants separate time.

Under 2200.95(k)(1), can an amicus curiae be given its own time to argue?

In extraordinary circumstances the amicus curiae may be allotted its own time for oral argument, but ordinarily participation is limited to part of the time allotted to the party in whose interest the amicus seeks to participate. See 2200.95(k)(1).

  • If you represent an amicus seeking independent time, explain the extraordinary circumstances in the motion.
  • The Commission retains discretion to grant or deny standalone argument time.

Under the OSHA letter of interpretation dated September 27, 2004, are settlement agreements between OSHA and employers always posted on OSHA’s website?

No—OSHA’s letter explains that only major settlement agreements are posted on the OSHA website, while the majority of settlement agreements are not posted though they remain subject to disclosure under FOIA. See the September 27, 2004 letter of interpretation at https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2004-09-27-0.

  • The letter clarifies that posted materials are consistent with FOIA and the Electronic FOIA Amendments of 1996.
  • Settlement agreements not posted can still be requested via FOIA procedures.

Letters of Interpretation (1)